[dbwg] WHOIS Modification - Part 1 of 2

william at elan.net wrote:

> Neither RIPE nor APNIC have very consistent entry for address, seems to me
> they keep it as one large field in their database all together. I'd like
> this not happen to ARIN, so it should always be clear when some data is
> missing (i.e. state, zip or city).

I agree.  For clarity and ease of parsing both, I'd prefer the separate tags.
Removing the slash from the St/Prov  tag would probably also be wise in the
interest of "bug prevention".