[dbwg] WHOIS Modification - Part 1 of 2

gl> #4 - 3 in favor
gl> Address: Toronto Ont M7A 1L2
gl>
gl> #5 - 3 in favor
gl> City:    Toronto
gl> St/Prov: Ont
gl> Postal:  M7A 1L2
gl>
gl> [...]
gl> If no additional comments are received by Friday December 6,
gl> we will proceed to implement format #4.

lr> I am interested in whether #4 would be found to be preferable
lr> to #5 if the choice was narrowed to those two, with the above
lr> difference highlighted.  I would be hoping for #5, maybe with
lr> slightly different field name labels if desired.

Do you have any suggestions regarding the field name labels?