DBWG Message

phone types (fwd)

Ginny,

One possible way to resolve the phone number formatting issue would be to
store it in ITU standard form. My memory may be foggy, but I believe that
the old "CCITT" (now ITU) standard that is relevant is "E.163"

John

On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, ginny listman wrote:

> are dots (.) better than dashes (-)?
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:51:56 -0800
> From: Paul Ebersman <ebersman at pae.com>
> To: ginny listman <ginny at arin.net>
> Subject: Re: phone types 
> 
> 
> ginny> Are there any other characters we should include that would
> ginny> take into consideration non-US, non-CA phone numbers?
> 
> Using a period instead of a hyphen is more accepted outside the US and
> is becoming more common in the US. I vaguely remember it being some
> ISO standard to do so, but don't quote me.
> 
> +<country-code>.<rest-of-phone-number> where <rest-of-phone-number>
> would be <area-code>.<NPA>.<NXX> in the US would probably be
> "acceptable" all over the world.
> 
>