phone types
Alex Kamantauskas
alexk at tugger.net
Wed Dec 27 12:40:59 EST 2000
- Previous message: phone types
- Next message: phone types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Would there be fields for other devices? Cell phones, etc? On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, ginny listman wrote: > Of course this would be an optional field. Maintaining current page phone > number, as with other phone number and mailboxes would be the POC's > responsibility. If you feel keeping up with current page number requires > too much maintainence, opt not to provide it. > > The only reason I ask the question is that a number of phone fields that > are designate to be Commercial Phone are listed as (123) 456-7890 (Pager). > I'm looking to clean-up the database, and one thing I would like to > enforce is that phone numbers consist of the following: 01234567890+-() > > In the future, if you fill out the phone line with something like: > 1-543.433.8765 (this is my pager) > what gets store in the database, and displayed in whois: > (543) 433-8765 > Well at least for those phone number in the US. Other country phone > numbers would be stored as entered. Just working on uniformity. > > Ginny > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Alex Kamantauskas wrote: > > > > > Most people I know change pager services so frequently that maintaining > > the POC pager number record would become a pain... > > > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, ginny listman wrote: > > > > > Do we need the ability to allow a POC to enter a pager phone number? > > > > > > Ginny > > > > > > > -- > > Alex Kamantauskas > > alexk at tugger.net > > > > -- Alex Kamantauskas alexk at tugger.net
- Previous message: phone types
- Next message: phone types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the DBWG mailing list