[consult] Call for Community Consultation - Lame Delegation Information in WHOIS
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Fri Oct 12 15:14:35 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Lame Delegation Information in WHOIS
- Next message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Lame Delegation Information in WHOIS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 11:15 -0400 10/9/07, Member Services wrote: >The complete suggestion can be viewed at: >http://www.arin.net/acsp/suggestions/2007-29.html > ... 22>1) Is it necessary to indicate which delegations are lame within the >network block within WHOIS? >2) If yes, how should this information be displayed in WHOIS? As the suggester, I'm for per zone enforcement. To answer the two issue questions: 1) No. 2) See #1 ;) I don't think that the goal is punishment or labeling because this might have other repercussions (esp. if space is returned and reused). The goal is to make the DNS work better. So, once efforts to get the situation fixed have been unsuccessful, all that is needed is to drop the offending NS RRs from the zone file. This is a DNS issue, not really a registry issue. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Think glocally. Act confused.
- Previous message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Lame Delegation Information in WHOIS
- Next message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Lame Delegation Information in WHOIS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the consult mailing list