[consult] Additional background information
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Sun Mar 18 08:33:42 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [consult] Additional background information
- Next message: [consult] Additional background information
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for this input, this is what is really needed to start the discussion on the topic. (The official problem statement is too vague.) First, uh, some questions I have (these are for clarification, not to criticize): is how much trouble is it to use non-automated means to get this information? Can you (now) just submit a free-form request via mail to hostmaster and receive the data back in a later email? How much of a pain is it? How hard is it to justify the request? How long do you have to wait for the response, especially relative to your deadline for getting the answer (or relative to when you are prepared to deal with the answer). This last question is rather odd-ball, so let me retry - when you ask for the data are you already in a position where you need the answer to proceed with a request, and has there been times you had to delay an answer because you had to wait for the data. Second set directed at the staff/hostmasters: How often to you see requests like those Heather mentions - I mean, not how often from Heather/Verizon but across the board? Is this a general problem? (The answer maybe skewed because another ISP may not think to ask for the data once denied by the WhoIs server.) I think that it is quite acceptable that this is a need for ISPs and not for the general public. (I'll plug IRIS here - with IRIS a client can authenticate as an ISP POC and then be allowed to have the higher limit. Yadda, yadda, yadda. Perhaps standing up an experimental IRIS server and handing out credentials that allow over-size responses is something that can be put to trial.) Also - I sent an earlier mail asking for input from the staff. As this consultation is supposed to end soon, it would be real nice if there was a response from the staff (including "we can't give that feedback") in time to respond before the imposed discussion termination deadline. At 3:29 +0000 3/17/07, Heather Skanks wrote: ... >Since I'm the person who submitted the request, I'm happy to provide some >information on how we've been impacted. ... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Sarcasm doesn't scale.
- Previous message: [consult] Additional background information
- Next message: [consult] Additional background information
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the consult mailing list