Notice: Subject control? and thanks!
Bill Darte
billd at cait.wustl.edu
Wed May 10 14:42:33 EDT 2000
- Previous message: ARIN document was: Long over due
- Next message: Point of order....please.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Below, I responded to a message about a general ARIN, addressing and conservation document for non-techies.... yet the subject was RE:Long over due.....just like all the rest.... I propose that we should use the RE: to the same subject when a subject specifies the actual content of the message, and make up a new subject when we initiate a new item or when we take an existing topic on a tangent discussion.... It's hard to remember to do this, but as a point of order, it will make keeping up with messages we are interested easier and less cumbersome overall..... Bill Darte....and oh...thanks for the response...eureka! maybe there is like in CLEW. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Darte [mailto:billd at cait.wustl.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 1:31 PM > To: Clew Workgroup (E-mail) > Subject: RE: Long over due > > > Yeah, I think the issues you raise ("who we are and what we > do" document)probably fit squarely in the center of how the Internet > technology is managed...ICANN on down...and then what are > Registries and why > we need them...and how ISPs are agents of the registries and > how address > consumers have a role in conservation through good > planning/assignments..e.g. VLSM etc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gene Jakominich [mailto:gene at netreach.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:03 PM > > To: Clew Workgroup (E-mail) > > Subject: RE: Long over due > > > > > > I think we should prepare a general "who we are and what we > > do" document for > > the public. The http 1.1 issues are important and need to > > be discussed, > > however I feel that we should first work on some explanatory > > documentation > > (for the public non-techies) regarding ARINs functionality > > and operational > > procedures. > > > > -gene > > > > ------------------------------- > > Gene J. Jakominich Jr. > > Network Administrator > > NetReach, Inc. > > 215.283.2300x111 > > 215.283.2335 fax > > http://www.netreach.net > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb at clark.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:06 PM > > To: Bill Darte; Clew Workgroup (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: Long over due > > > > > > At 8:19 AM -0500 5/10/2000, Bill Darte wrote: > > >Clew members... > > > > > >At the Calgary meeting many of spoke about the need to get the CLEW > > >workgroup established and working on substantive issues that > > members and > > the > > >industry need.....Education about ARIN, addressing, whatever.... > > > > > >I promised that when I got back I would prime the workgroup > > with a message. > > >A message that would elicit response to see if the mail > > server 'really > > >works' and to see if anyone would 'really respond'.... so > > here it is..... > > > > > >Is anyone listening out there? > > > > > >I propose that each of you identify one, just 1, topic that > > you think would > > >be of interest or is needed by the address providers or > > consumers.... I > > >would be willing to aggregate the list and prioritize the > > efforts toward > > >accomplishing the tasks on the list. > > > > My hot button is probably microallocations and recommended > > multihoming practices. > > > > > > > >So, please send your topic and let's get started. > > > > > >BTW....my topic is the creation of a two-day workshop that > > explains about > > >addressing history, the dilemmas of addressing and route > > tables, the need > > >for conservation, ARIN and it's agenda...ICANN and it's > > agenda....IPv6 and > > >it's agenda....etc. This seminar would be taught by me and > > would travel > > to > > >whatever ISP arranged customer/industry gathering which > > requests it on a > > >first-come, first-served basis. Local organizations would > > support the cost > > >of the local arrangements and seminar leaders travel..... > > the cost of the > > >leader would be supported by ARIN out of a Education fund, to be > > >established. The actual leader would be an ARIN employee or > > some contract > > >educator like myself or others. > > > > As far as the seminar, I do have a book out, _Designing Addressing > > Architectures for Routing and Switching_ (Macmillan), that could > > serve as the basis for such a course. > > > > I am now working for Nortel, which is very supportive of my getting > > involved here. > > > > > > > >Bill Darte > > >ARIN AC member > > >
- Previous message: ARIN document was: Long over due
- Next message: Point of order....please.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CLEW mailing list