Long over due
Kim Hubbard
kimh at arin.net
Wed May 10 12:22:18 EDT 2000
- Previous message: Long over due
- Next message: Long over due
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason, I'd really like to get the discussion started on this topic but the policy mailing list is probably best. Could you send a message to that list? Thanks, Kim At 10:28 AM 5/10/00 -0600, Jason Redisch wrote: >Hello All, > At some point before the next meeting I wanted to discuss the transfer >policy. I don't know if this is the right forum or not, but since it is the >only active one.. . > > At the last meeting the fact that transfers have increased was brought up >and the whole transfer policy was to be revisited at the next meeting. > >from the minutes: >"The number of organizational transfers have been increasing. Whether this >is due to organizations not having to justify space, or because the fee is >minimal, is not clear. Members were asked to be thinking about whether >ARIN's transfer policy should be changed. Statistics on the number of >transfers will be provided in the future." > >I think it would make sense to discuss this either here or in the policy >working group. I have some ideas about how we might be able to better >protect the community from 'unjustified' transfers and would really like to >hear others input on this topic. > >/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ >Jason Redisch (w) 720-528-4368 >Sr IP Engineer (f) 720-528-4361 >Virtela Communications > > >-----Original Message----- >From: clew-request at arin.net [mailto:clew-request at arin.net]On Behalf Of >Bill Darte >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 7:19 AM >To: Clew Workgroup (E-mail) >Subject: Long over due > > >Clew members... > >At the Calgary meeting many of spoke about the need to get the CLEW >workgroup established and working on substantive issues that members and the >industry need.....Education about ARIN, addressing, whatever.... > >I promised that when I got back I would prime the workgroup with a message. >A message that would elicit response to see if the mail server 'really >works' and to see if anyone would 'really respond'.... so here it is..... > >Is anyone listening out there? > >I propose that each of you identify one, just 1, topic that you think would >be of interest or is needed by the address providers or consumers.... I >would be willing to aggregate the list and prioritize the efforts toward >accomplishing the tasks on the list. > >So, please send your topic and let's get started. > >BTW....my topic is the creation of a two-day workshop that explains about >addressing history, the dilemmas of addressing and route tables, the need >for conservation, ARIN and it's agenda...ICANN and it's agenda....IPv6 and >it's agenda....etc. This seminar would be taught by me and would travel to >whatever ISP arranged customer/industry gathering which requests it on a >first-come, first-served basis. Local organizations would support the cost >of the local arrangements and seminar leaders travel..... the cost of the >leader would be supported by ARIN out of a Education fund, to be >established. The actual leader would be an ARIN employee or some contract >educator like myself or others. > >Bill Darte >ARIN AC member
- Previous message: Long over due
- Next message: Long over due
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CLEW mailing list