From mcrossin at arin.net  Tue Jan 10 13:48:59 2017
From: mcrossin at arin.net (Michael Crossin)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:48:59 +0000
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] January OT&E Database Refresh
Message-ID: <0ECC3029-03B7-4659-9334-DD420CB26310@arin.net>

List,

This message serves as a notification that the Operational Testing and Evaluation environment will soon begin its monthly maintenance for data refresh today.

Scheduled Work:

The OT&E whois and other application servers will now update with refreshed database data.
Querying whois.ote.arin.net will not respond until this maintenance has completed.

Expected Duration:

6 hours

Updates:

Following the scheduled maintenance there will be a follow up message indicating completion.

Thanks,

Mike Crossin
Database Systems Administrator
American Registry for Internet Numbers?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170110/7453d363/attachment.html>

From nyguerrillagirl at brainycode.com  Tue Jan 10 17:51:23 2017
From: nyguerrillagirl at brainycode.com (nyguerillagirl brainycode.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:51:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] ARIN reassign mail rejected but no reason why.
In-Reply-To: <0ECC3029-03B7-4659-9334-DD420CB26310@arin.net>
References: <0ECC3029-03B7-4659-9334-DD420CB26310@arin.net>
Message-ID: <218607874.36771.1484088683809@webmail.networksolutionsemail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170110/28aece7c/attachment.html>

From jonw at arin.net  Tue Jan 10 17:54:36 2017
From: jonw at arin.net (Jon Worley)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:54:36 +0000
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] ARIN reassign mail rejected but no reason
 why.
In-Reply-To: <218607874.36771.1484088683809@webmail.networksolutionsemail.com>
References: <0ECC3029-03B7-4659-9334-DD420CB26310@arin.net>
 <218607874.36771.1484088683809@webmail.networksolutionsemail.com>
Message-ID: <D49AD07E.15A7A2%jonw@arin.net>

Hello Lorraine,

It sounds like you?d prefer to work on this directly with us as opposed to publicly on the arin-tech-discuss list.  I will contact you off-list to get details about the problem.

Regards,

Jon Worley
Technical Services Manager
ARIN Registration Services
https://www.arin.net/
hostmaster at arin.net
703.227.0660

From: arin-tech-discuss <arin-tech-discuss-bounces at arin.net<mailto:arin-tech-discuss-bounces at arin.net>> on behalf of "nyguerillagirl brainycode.com" <nyguerrillagirl at brainycode.com<mailto:nyguerrillagirl at brainycode.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 5:51 PM
To: Michael Crossin <mcrossin at arin.net<mailto:mcrossin at arin.net>>, "arin-tech-discuss at arin.net<mailto:arin-tech-discuss at arin.net>" <arin-tech-discuss at arin.net<mailto:arin-tech-discuss at arin.net>>
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] ARIN reassign mail rejected but no reason why.



Our company uses e-mail to register and release IPs with ARIN.  We recently received the following mail:


Hello,

ARIN was unable to process your request:

    An error occurred while processing your template. Please contact us.

Many errors can be prevented by ensuring your e-mail client
sends mail as "Plain Text", not as "HTML" or "Rich Text".
ARIN only accepts templates in plain text format.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any additional
questions, comments, or concerns.

Web: Ask ARIN while logged in to your ARIN Online account
E-mail: hostmaster at arin.net<mailto:hostmaster at arin.net>
Phone: +1.703.227.0660

Regards,

Registration Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers


I left out the details of the request.  We usually get specific error details. Who should we send the contents to in order to get  better idea on what went wrong


Thanks,

Lorraine Figueroa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170110/955fb871/attachment.html>

From mcrossin at arin.net  Tue Jan 10 19:55:29 2017
From: mcrossin at arin.net (Michael Crossin)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:55:29 +0000
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] January OT&E Database Refresh Completed
Message-ID: <47C54913-1D3E-471D-8A59-EEF53F9FD3C4@arin.net>

List,

This message serves as a notification that the January refresh of the Operational Testing and Evaluation environment has been completed.

All systems within this environment should be accessible to you now if you have requested access to it. If you have requested access previously, there is no need to re-request.

If you experience any issues in using the OT&E environment or notice anything erroneous, please reach out to us.

Thanks,

Mike Crossin
Database Systems Administrator
American Registry for Internet Numbers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170111/2eeb9e49/attachment.html>

From 33sears at gmail.com  Sun Jan 15 11:13:09 2017
From: 33sears at gmail.com (JD Sea)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 11:13:09 -0500
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] January OT&E Database Refresh Completed
In-Reply-To: <47C54913-1D3E-471D-8A59-EEF53F9FD3C4@arin.net>
References: <47C54913-1D3E-471D-8A59-EEF53F9FD3C4@arin.net>
Message-ID: <CAKwVNfxC-r_HjhPfw-Hms8WBxErQCkOX_PfRde6D+txbomRV3g@mail.gmail.com>

Dear ARIN,

How do I remove myself from this email chain? Or can you asist?


Thank you,
John Sears




On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Michael Crossin <mcrossin at arin.net> wrote:

> List,
>
>
>
> This message serves as a notification that the January refresh of the
> Operational Testing and Evaluation environment has been completed.
>
>
>
> All systems within this environment should be accessible to you now if you
> have requested access to it. If you have requested access previously, there
> is no need to re-request.
>
>
>
> If you experience any issues in using the OT&E environment or notice
> anything erroneous, please reach out to us.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Mike Crossin
>
> Database Systems Administrator
>
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arin-tech-discuss mailing list
> arin-tech-discuss at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170115/0df371f3/attachment.html>

From Anthony.DeLaCruz at CenturyLink.com  Fri Jan 27 11:37:02 2017
From: Anthony.DeLaCruz at CenturyLink.com (Delacruz, Anthony B)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:37:02 +0000
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] Another option for API and email?
Message-ID: <398B250423578A4E97AFE1B8B67C686C64AE97DF@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet>

I use old school emails and API key on some of my submissions as not all of our ranges are covered by the restful tool we have, internal politics, databases and the such. I have other teams that need to do some updates and considering let them email as well to distribute more work. I don't want to just give them an api key that seems like once you have the api key then anything is up for grabs and it could be easily shared. I don't want to make these lower level staff related POC that has caused too much trouble in the past by their lack of understanding to even allow them an arin online account. The option to associate it comes with all these warnings of doom and gloom inside the arin online, though that seems like it adds a measure of security? Now at least only that email can send in request where if anyone has an api key it doesn't matter what email it comes from they can make changes. Could/should there be an option where both the API key and email must match and both be submitted for the request to be processed? Would that tighten up security? Are there other suggestions as to how to distribute some change ability buy still have measured control? I've spent months cleaning up bad records where former staff did completely bad and wrong entries and don't want to again.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170127/de2d4cbb/attachment.html>

From andy at arin.net  Mon Jan 30 12:33:14 2017
From: andy at arin.net (Andy Newton)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:33:14 +0000
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] Another option for API and email?
In-Reply-To: <398B250423578A4E97AFE1B8B67C686C64AE97DF@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet>
References: <398B250423578A4E97AFE1B8B67C686C64AE97DF@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet>
Message-ID: <C6067942-1E82-4A6C-AFB9-8C9F52A25A7F@arin.net>

Hi Anthony,

The email address associated with an API Key was created for older template systems that could not accommodate the API Key in the email template. Currently, the system allows either a match from the email address or the presence of the API Key but does not force the email templates to contain an API Key if it is from the associated email address.

If you would like us to add a new feature for requiring both the API Key and a matched sending email address, we can contact you to have this formally submitted through the ARIN Consultation and Suggestion Process (ACSP). (https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/index.html).

You may also be interested in a previously submitted request, ACSP 2011.17 (https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/suggestions/2011-17.html), which requests the ability to assign more granular access permissions for API Keys.

Thanks for your time.
Andy Newton,
Chief Engineer

On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Delacruz, Anthony B <Anthony.DeLaCruz at CenturyLink.com<mailto:Anthony.DeLaCruz at centurylink.com>> wrote:

I use old school emails and API key on some of my submissions as not all of our ranges are covered by the restful tool we have, internal politics, databases and the such. I have other teams that need to do some updates and considering let them email as well to distribute more work. I don?t want to just give them an api key that seems like once you have the api key then anything is up for grabs and it could be easily shared. I don?t want to make these lower level staff related POC that has caused too much trouble in the past by their lack of understanding to even allow them an arin online account. The option to associate it comes with all these warnings of doom and gloom inside the arin online, though that seems like it adds a measure of security? Now at least only that email can send in request where if anyone has an api key it doesn?t matter what email it comes from they can make changes. Could/should there be an option where both the API key and email must match and both be submitted for the request to be processed? Would that tighten up security? Are there other suggestions as to how to distribute some change ability buy still have measured control? I?ve spent months cleaning up bad records where former staff did completely bad and wrong entries and don?t want to again.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
_______________________________________________
arin-tech-discuss mailing list
arin-tech-discuss at arin.net<mailto:arin-tech-discuss at arin.net>
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20170130/ffea8d07/attachment.html>