[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Leif Sawyer]

Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.

Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody.   There's certainly a lot to think about here.

Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located here:
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551

And, to help clarify some confusion, per  6.5.5.3.1  (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks"   may use censored data,  i.e.  "Private Customer/Residence"
in lieu of actual names and street addresses.

--

With that said,  I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential rewrites that are brewing.

First:    Assuming a preference for /56  (based on PPML feedback)  for the moment,   which is the more
preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?


a)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.



b)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.


Second:   Given your specific choice of A or B,  are you preferentially inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"

Third:  If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed approach?



Thanks,

  Leif Sawyer
Advisory Council

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170717/c3765be8/attachment.htm>