[arin-ppml] Clarification on AC Abandonment of Prop-176: Increasing Justification to 60 Months

[Scott Leibrand]

Jeff,

While the majority of the AC disagreed with my opinion that it would be
best to have this proposal on the docket for discussion in October,
everyone did seem to agree that this was an important issue to discuss.
 ARIN does report on registration and transfer activity at each meeting: I
will be particularly interested to see how inter-RIR transfers play out
over the first few months they're available.  If/when you have any insight
there, I'd like to hear it as well.

-Scott

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:12 AM, <jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com>wrote:

> Thank you Kevin.  It will then be interesting to understand what metrics
> are being applied and monitored to determine whether 24 months is an
> appropriate duration for justification.  The onus for change should not
> be on external parties, but rather, ARIN staff should produce statistics
> that support the AC's assertion that 24 months is appropriate.
>
> Jeff Mehlenbacher
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Clarification on AC Abandonment of Prop-176:
> Increasing Justification to 60 Months
> From: Kevin Blumberg <kevinb at thewire.ca>
> Date: Fri, July 27, 2012 9:45 am
> To: "jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com"
> <jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com>, "arin-ppml at arin.net"
> <arin-ppml at arin.net>
>
> Jeff,
>
> It was a mistake on my part. I apologize. It should of read as:
>
> 176. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted not to accept onto the
> docket,ARIN-prop-176 "Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60 months".
> The AC feels that with the change to 24 month window in 8.3 having
> recently
> been implemented, it would be premature to increase the window of
> justification.
> As well there was concern over 60 month networking plans being
> speculative
> and difficult to evaluate."
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Blumberg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> > Behalf Of jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com
> > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 7:58 AM
> > To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: [arin-ppml] Clarification on AC Abandonment of Prop-176:
> Increasing
> > Justification to 60 Months
> >
> > I wonder if a representative of the AC might clarify the following
> statement
> > relating to the abandonment of Prop-176:
> >
> > 176. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted not to accept onto the
> > docket,ARIN-prop-176 "Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60 months".
> > The AC
> > feels that with the change to 24 month window in 8.3 having not yet been
> > implemented, it would be premature to increase the window of
> justification.
> > As well there was concern over 60 month networking plans being
> speculative
> > and difficult to evaluate."
> >
> > I actually do not understand the language above...24 months was approved
> > and implemented on February 10th, 2012.
> >
> > Any clarification would be appreciated.
> >
> > Jeff Mehlenbacher
> > IPv4 Market Group
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> > Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120727/3e357a94/attachment.htm>