ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - July 2012

> The AC abandoned proposals 166, 173, 174, 176, and 178. Anyone
> dissatisfied with these decisions may initiate a petition. The
> petition to advance a proposal would be the "Discussion Petition." The
> deadline to begin a petition will be five business days after the AC's
> draft meeting minutes are published. For more information on starting
> and participating in petitions, see PDP Petitions at:

The minutes of the AC's 19 July 2012 meeting have been published and are
available at:
https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac/index.html

The deadline to begin a petition is 9 August 2012.

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


On 7/25/12 3:23 PM, ARIN wrote:
> In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process, the ARIN
> Advisory Council (AC) held a meeting on 19 July 2012 and made
> decisions about several draft policies and proposals.
>
> The AC selected the following proposal as a draft policy for adoption
> discussion online and at the ARIN Public Policy Meeting in Dallas in
> October (ARIN XXX). The draft policy will be posted shortly to the PPML.
>
>   ARIN-prop-167 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
>
> The following proposals were added to the AC's docket for development
> and evaluation:
>
>   ARIN-prop-175 Delete Section 8.2
>   ARIN-prop-177 Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
>
> The AC abandoned the following proposals:
>
>   ARIN-prop-166 Clarify /29 Assignment Identification Requirement
>   ARIN-prop-173 Revisions to M&A Transfer Requirements
>   ARIN-prop-174 Policies Apply to All Resources in the Registry
>   ARIN-prop-176 Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60 months on 8.3
> Specified Transfers
>   ARIN-prop-178 Regional Use of Resources
>
> The AC provided the following statements about the abandoned proposals:
>
> 166. "The Advisory Council abandoned ARIN-Prop-166 because the current
> text is not technically sound and there has not been any significant
> community support for this policy change. The AC did however want to
> address the originator's intent and therefore the proposal's shepherd
> submitted the original text to ARINs suggestion process as ACSP
> Suggestion 2012.13 - CUSTOMER IDENTITY NOT REQUIRED ON /29 AND SMALLER
> REASSIGNMENTS."
>
> 173. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted to abandon ARIN-prop-173:
> Revisions to M&A Transfer Requirements.  Consensus of the AC was that
> prop-173 was a political statement in the context of a larger
> discussion and that as such it is not necessary. Moreover, it was felt
> that if changes to section 8.2 of the NRPM were required there were
> other proposals in play that would make the tweaks in a more
> fine-grained manner."
>
> 174. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted to abandon ARIN-prop-174:
> Policies Apply to All Resources in the Registry.  Consensus of the AC
> was that prop-174 was a political statement in the context of a larger
> discussion and that as such it is not necessary. Moreover, it was felt
> that the issue is handeled sufficiently in the RSA or LRSA contracts."
>
> 176. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted not to accept onto the docket,
> ARIN-prop-176 "Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60 months". The
> AC feels that with the change to 24 month window in 8.3 having not yet
> been implemented, it would be premature to increase the window of
> justification. As well there was concern over 60 month networking
> plans being speculative and difficult to evaluate."
>
> 178. "The ARIN Advisory Council voted to abandon ARIN-prop-178
> "Regional Use of Resources". This proposal was brought forth in
> response to ARIN staff comments at the last public policy meeting
> regarding there being a lack of definition of where resources from a
> particular RIR could be used. The consensus of the AC was that this is
> an issue that merits further discussion and investigation but that the
> proposed text in prop-178 is not the solution. The AC plans to work on
> this issue at its next working session."
>
> The AC abandoned proposals 166, 173, 174, 176, and 178. Anyone
> dissatisfied with these decisions may initiate a petition. The
> petition to advance a proposal would be the "Discussion Petition." The
> deadline to begin a petition will be five business days after the AC's
> draft meeting minutes are published. For more information on starting
> and participating in petitions, see PDP Petitions at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html
>
> Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)