[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - IAB comment
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net> wrote:
> William Herrin:
> The point is there are lots of ways to break things, the trick is to find
> ways to make them work without requiring end user awareness, or massive
> support structures...
My suggestion would be that 2011-5 space, when assigned to CPE
always be conjoined with full, proper, native IPv6 support.
You are talking about breaking IPv6 transition technologies that don't
work with RFC1918 space in the first place; the breakage is highly
similar, when non-recognizable unroutable public IPs are used.
At least a shared /10 allocated under 2011-5 would be recognizable.