[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - IAB comment
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:05:51PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> Therefore, I would like to suggest representatives from the ARIN
> Community, and the ARIN AC, author and submit and Informational RFC
> documenting the allocation of the /10 per ARIN policy development
> process, including the technical details and justification
> surrounding it. And, once the Draft is submitted, the board move
> forward with implementing 2011-5 based on the precedence of the
> allocation of 2001:DB8::/32 by APNIC, as documented in RFC3849. I
> believe RFC2860 is clear that the IETF has a role, and it is
I believe there is a rather significant difference between your reading of
the MoU between the IETF and ICANN and what it actually says:
It doesn't say that the IETF has 'a' role in this matter, it says the IETF
is responsible for 'assignment of specialised address blocks'.
> desirable and necessary that such an allocation should be documented
> in RFCs, but it is not clear to me that ARIN cannot and MUST not
> make such an allocation base on the clear policy will of its
> community, especially based on the precedent of RFC 3849.
> 1. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3849
> 2. http://archive.apnic.net/meetings/14/sigs/policy/minutes.html#7
> 3. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-ipv6-documentation-prefix-00
> David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.