[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - IAB comment

[John Curran]

On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:28 AM, John Curran wrote:
> 
> There are several organizations which have sufficient need on their own to 
> justify such allocations, and to my knowledge nothing precludes them sharing 
> the use of such an allocation.  

In doing some exploring of this option, it turns out to now be much 
more difficult to qualify for such an allocation due to the change 
in allocation window that occurred with the issuance of the final /8,
i.e.  there may not be any organization today that qualifies for a
/10 allocation based on their allocation history and three months of
demand.  

I wanted to make sure the community was aware of this, since my 
characterization above was incorrect.

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN