ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-1 - Inter-RIR Transfers - Shepherd's Inquiry

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 15:08, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess I'm not clear on what the consensus looks like at this point
> since I'm under the impression that there is a significant lack of
> support community wise.

>From the straw poll at the PPM in San Juan (116 in the room):
1) 2011-1 as written? 18 in favor, 11 against
2) The principle of creating an inter-RIR transfer policy? 41 in
favor, 1 against
3) The principle of a needs-based inter-RIR transfer policy? 36 in
favor, 2 against

I believe that is exactly what rough consensus looks like. I am forced
to characterize that as a _significant *show* of support_ and denounce
your claim to the contrary.

> But fair enough. Considering the lack of support overall though, I'd
> strongly suggest abandonment as a serious issue for continued AC
> discussion.

Repeating a falsehood does not make it so. The community as a whole
has very clearly asked us to work on this policy.

I have asked you before and will ask again: What has changed your
opinion so violently on this topic since we wrote this proposal
together 8 months ago?

Cheers,
~Chris

>
> Best,
>
> -M<
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org