[arin-ppml] [Fwd: Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition Spacefor IPv4 Address Extension]

[Frank Bulk]

George:

When you say "people", do you include non-service providers?  Do you think
that even if we mark the space for "service providers" only, that that note
will be ignored?

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of George Bonser
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 1:28 PM
To: Benson Schliesser; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] [Fwd: Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition
Spacefor IPv4 Address Extension]

> > The only argument against that I see remaining sounds a lot like
> > "well, I might be the guy who gets part of that /10 for myself..."
> >
> > If there are other arguments that I have missed, or if I am
> > miscalculating the cost of this proposal, I would love to be
> > enlightened.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > ~Chris

I am neutral on this one.  The argument I see is that once that /10 is
set aside for that purpose, you have no control that it is actually used
for that purpose.  It will become de facto 1918 space and people will
use it in all sorts of places and you run into exactly the problem this
/10 was meant to solve (resolving collisions between customer 1918
domains) when you start running into customer nets numbered in this /10
or nets in regions outside ARIN numbered in this range.



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.