[arin-ppml] FW: Proposal: Clarification of draft policy 2009-3 (ARIN-prop-135)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:26 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
[ snip ]
> I don't like the smell of the process that tricked the proposal's
> author. If 131 is opposed, let it be opposed in open debate. Don't try
> to kill it by implying the existence of competing obligations where
> there are none.
> And if I'm just jaded and I've misinterpreted honest confusion and
> poorly chosen words, let's bring that out into the light of day and
> then proceed with 131v3 without the "misunderstanding" about its
> relationship with 2009-3.
Let's dial this back a bit. The AC meeting results will be coming out
shortly and you will see, formally, what transpired. I'm sure that if
there are still gaps at that point, we can discuss how to fill them
and how to move forward in the way that the community would like to.