[arin-ppml] Proposal: Clarification of draft policy 2009-3 (ARIN-prop-135)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
> <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>> I'm opposed to any policy that even comes close to allowing ARIN to give
>> resources back to IANA.
> Hi Jeffrey,
> Draft policy 2009-3 has already passed. Do you support clarifying that
> ARIN is not to return addresses to IANA under 2009-3 unless the
> community specifically directs them to (which you would presumably not
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Benson Schliesser
> <bensons at queuefull.net> wrote:
>> I do not think ARIN should dump these back into the market at low prices,
>> because of the potential market volatility and because of "fairness"
>> questions that might emerge (i.e. who gets to buy these cheap addresses?).
> Hi Benson,
> That's actually already been hashed out in the waiting list policy
> (draft policy 2010-1, adopted last month).
> Bill Herrin
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Yes, I would support that. Regarding the comment about transferring if
there is a demand, there is excess demand in all regions so by that
logic there is never a reason to transfer resources out of ARIN.
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions