[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks - revised
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on
>> of Unaffiliated Address Blocks - revised
>> Opposed. The stated issue is moot in v6 and not of significant
>> magnitude in v4 to justify any effort or change.
> I tend to concur with that. I don't see what train is bearing down on
> us if we don't pass 133. In other words, what problem do we have right
> now that this is trying to solve (ignoring v4 runout which isn't so much
> a train hurtling at us as it is a slow lava flow that has been making
> its way toward us for decades).
> Many of these proposals are sort of like people living in Kalapana
> Gardens suddenly realizing there is a lava flow 20 feet from their house
> and demanding "somebody do something" so they can continue to live there
> another 10 years.
> Personally, I am going to look at all proposals in the light of "how
> does this make IPv6 better" and not really going waste a lot of time
> with proposals designed to focus on v4 unless they have to do with v6
> This proposal doesn't seem to have any impact on v6 that makes the
> internet "better" so I oppose.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Keep in mind that many of us still live on that volcano.
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions