[arin-ppml] [Fwd: ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses - revised ver. 3] revised ver. 4

[Jeffrey Lyon]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:40 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> Can you clarify that? Which global proposal and what was the conflict?
>
>  As the ARIN Board has already adopted ARIN-2009-3, we need to make
>  sure that 2009-3 (if/when made global) will not conflict.  We can do
>  that by including in pp 131 that no legacy space shall be designated
>  for return to IANA (if that is the intent of the policy proposal).
>
>  This avoids having 2009-3 somehow become active and we having a conflict
>  in adopted policy in NRPM, and having to establish precedence of various
>  sections, etc.
>
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>

This is a shot in left field, but considering that much of the legacy
space is /24 would there be any interest in requiring that legacy
space be collected but not reissued until it can be fully or
sufficiently aggregated?

-- 
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions