[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer Relationships
I think most of your concerns about prop 132 stem from a misunderstanding. The proposal doesn't change any other policy - it only deals with the definition of "customer".
But this issue is worth exploring:
On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> The ISP's ability to define customer should be contingent upon the
> ISP's definition of "customer" being reasonable.
How do you define "reasonable"? Do you feel that your definition is adequately fool-proof, such that it can be applied to the entire ARIN constituency? And does your definition achieve some desired result that prop 132 does not?