[arin-ppml] Use of the specified transfer policy (was: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers)

Although I have not been playing with these reports until just today,
I think Owen's suggestion has merit, especially as/if policy is
developed which requires ARIN to act in response to more than outright

I would further suggest (assuming I did not just miss it) historical
data being included in chart form. I am probably just being lazy,
since the data is there already; but a chart showing the total number
of reports and the top few actions taken (per quarter) would be handy
if it's easy to generate.


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:16, Owen DeLong <owen at> wrote:
> John,
> I suggest that the term fraud is detracting from the purpose of the report.
> Perhaps an ARIN policy violation report would be more useful.
> Owen
> Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Curran <jcurran at> wrote:
>>> On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>>> I didn't answer this question since I wanted to think about it. The
>>>> unfortunate answer here is that transfer policy already doesn't apply
>>>> to legacy holders from their perspective so hoping that they will sign
>>>> an agreement seems less than efficient.
>>> The transfer policy applies to all resources in ARIN's Whois Database.
>>> If you are aware of an attempt to contravene number resource policy,
>>> please submit a fraud report here: <>
>>> and we'll take care of it.
>> I would, but it appears that we're all disconnected as to what fraud
>> with respect to legacy resources actually is:
>> Best,
>> -M<
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at if you experience any issues.