ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks

John - 
 
 Despite the solicitation for services, it appears that the principal
 intent of using your email from the PPML list was discussion of the 
 the policy proposal.  I'd prefer you not report this as a violation
 of the ARIN Mailing List AUP and instead direct Mr. Thimmesch to join
 in the public discussion of the proposal on the PPML mailing list.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

On Feb 15, 2011, at 8:49 AM, John Santos wrote:
> Resending my whinge because the mailing list software may have eaten it...
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, someone wrote:
>> The email to which you refer was not included, but I'd be curious to see it...
> 
> It was listed as an attachment when I sent it.  Maybe it got filtered
> by the mailing list software?  I'll try to attach it again.
> 
> Extracted the plain-text version and inserted inline here:
> --------------------
> 
> Mr. Santos,
> 
> Please accept my apologies for the intrusion to your recent posting
> <http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2011-February/019810.html>
> regarding the proposed new ARIN Policy titled No Volunteer Services on
> Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks. While on the surface it may appear to
> be a negative proposal for legacy holders of IPv4 number blocks, I can
> assure you it is actually quite the opposite for it frees them once and for
> all from ARIN's illusionary claims. We, as the first commercial IP Address
> Internet Registry which only provides post-allocation services to legacy
> block holders, are fully supportive of this proposal. If you have any
> questions please contact me and we can either discuss this or continue a
> dialogue. 
> 
> If you are interested, our services are clearly provided for at
> www.depository.net 
> 
> Best regards, 
> Peter Thimmesch
> 
> Chairman
> 
> +1 703.871.4822 (o)
> +1 202.957.5805 (m)