ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Keith W. Hare <Keith at jcc.com> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Lyon
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:10 PM
>
>
>> As a matter of
>>transparency, it would be decent of anyone opposing this and similar
>>proposals to state any interest they may have in maintaining the
>>status quo for legacy space.
>
> Jeffrey,
>
> My interest in maintaining the status quo for legacy resources is that the system currently works. Unless a change is going to be a large benefit to the internet community, what is the point of changing?
>
> My company received a /24 in 1991. We signed an LRSA several years ago because it seemed a reasonable thing to do for the internet community.
>
> What is your interest in changing the status quo?
>
> Keith
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> Keith W. Hare                     JCC Consulting, Inc.
> keith at jcc.com                     600 Newark Road
> Phone: 740-587-0157               P.O. Box 381
> Fax: 740-587-0163                 Granville, Ohio 43023
> http://www.jcc.com                USA
> ______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>

Keith,

In a broad sense, my interest is to promote equality and help ensure
that all users of IP resources are bound to the same requirements. Our
company received its first directly assigned resources in 2004.

Specific to this proposition, I find it fundamentally flawed that I
have to pay for something that another receives for free merely
because they got in first.

-- 
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions