[arin-ppml] inevitability of NAT?
On 2/10/2011 11:47 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> There is no ability to have Rendezvous hosts in all of the Private2 sectors.
> This makes a huge difference in the way applications currently
> operate and means that porting to IPv6 is, in most cases, simpler
> than incorporating sufficient workarounds to cope with LSN/CGN.
On the other hand, if all LSN/CGN deployments properly hairpin on the
public interface, there is no need for rendezvous hosts in all the
Private 2 sectors. That only fixes one of many problems, though.