[arin-ppml] inevitability of NAT?
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Frank Bulk" writes:
> The hardware came before the implementation of IPv6 support. They tried to
> fit in existing hardware, but it didn't work. Future hardware revisions of
> some models will include expanded storage, allowing for SPI support.
I understand that with small routers and I wasn't complaining. I'm just
glad that products are starting to appear.
> I suspect that most consumer/SOHO router vendors are in the same predicament
> at D-Link.
> We can complain about the past, but that won't change anything. Better to
> make current and future purchasing decisions about what's out there -- I am.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org