ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-160 Clarification of Section 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

ARIN-prop-160 Clarification of Section 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
Development Process.

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.

The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Mailing list subscription information can be found
at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


ARIN-prop-160 Clarification of Section 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Proposal Originator: Martin Hannigan

Proposal Version: 1

Date: 22 DEC 2011

Proposal type: MODIFY

Policy term: PERMANENT

Policy statement:

Change policy statement from:

4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Reassignment information for prior allocations must show that each
customer meets the 80% utilization criteria and must be available via
SWIP / RWhois prior to your issuing them additional space.

To:

4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Reassignment information for prior allocations made from the same
ISP's inventory must show that each customer meets the 80% utilization
criteria and must be available via SWIP / RWhois prior to your issuing
them additional number resources.

Rationale:

Existing policy is vague.

Timetable for implementation: Immediate