[arin-ppml] Opposed to 2010-9 and 2010-12

[Mark Townsley]

 On 10/14/10 2:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
>>
>> This probably won't fly as policy, but, let me give it a shot. :)
>>
>>   Any address space provided by ARIN for 6rd will not be issued
>>   until the recipient delivers one engineer and one executive from
>>   the provider of the majority of their non-IPv6 capable equipment
>>   to an ARIN public policy meeting to receive a public flogging.
>>   The recipient must provide baseball bats for all policy meeting
>>   attendees.
>>
> I like it, but, I suspect you are right that it wouldn't fly as policy.

When free.fr gave a presentation on their 6rd deployment at a RIPE
meeting last year, they received not one but two standing ovations for
providing a production-quality, supported, IPv6 service option to all of
their subscribers.

This contrast is nothing short of remarkable to me.

- Mark