[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2010-12: IPv6 Subsequent Allocation - Last Call (text revised)

[William Herrin]

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> To clarify, the /24 maximum and the designated block apply ONLY
> to subsequent allocations for transitional purposes. Subsequent allocations
> for native IPv6 deployment are not restricted or encumbered in any way
> other than the standards set forth in existing policy.

Ah. In that case, I OPPOSE draft policy 2010-12 as written.

I would support a revised version that applies the /24 limit to any
subsequent allocation _for which the prior efficient utilization
requirements have been waived_, regardless of whether its for
transitional technologies.

Regards,
Bill



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004