[arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 14:37, Bill Darte <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
> could do this....or can...as you wish.
I'll stick with can for now. =) Thanks for clarifying Bill.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Grundemann [mailto:cgrundemann at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sun 10/10/2010 2:39 PM
> To: Bill Darte
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:05, Bill Darte <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
>> As you know, at our lunch table discussion 'fighting over the crumbs of
>> I made mention that I believed it was beyond the scope of ARIN's mission
>> 'mandate a business practice change' like requiring v6 implementation as a
>> condition of receiving future v4 allocations.
> And I argue that ARIN policy already dictates business practice
> through needs based assignment/allocation based on efficient
>> In a brief discussion about the legality of such....I now believe(or
>> interpret what I heard) that ARIN might arguably do this without undue
> I'm sorry - does that say that you now believe ARIN *can* do this
> without risk or can *not* do this without risk? Could you provide any
> more detail?
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.