[arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)

could do this....or you wish.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Grundemann [mailto:cgrundemann at]
Sent: Sun 10/10/2010 2:39 PM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: arin-ppml at
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:05, Bill Darte <BillD at> wrote:
> Chris,
> As you know, at our lunch table discussion 'fighting over the crumbs of v4',
> I made mention that I believed it was beyond the scope of ARIN's mission to
> 'mandate a business practice change' like requiring v6 implementation as a
> condition of receiving future v4 allocations.

And I argue that ARIN policy already dictates business practice
through needs based assignment/allocation based on efficient

> In a brief discussion about the legality of such....I now believe(or
> interpret what I heard) that ARIN might arguably do this without undue
> risk....

I'm sorry - does that say that you now believe ARIN *can* do this
without risk or can *not* do this without risk? Could you provide any
more detail?

> FYI...


> bd
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at if you experience any issues.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>