[arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
could do this....or can...as you wish.
From: Chris Grundemann [mailto:cgrundemann at gmail.com]
Sent: Sun 10/10/2010 2:39 PM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:05, Bill Darte <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
> As you know, at our lunch table discussion 'fighting over the crumbs of v4',
> I made mention that I believed it was beyond the scope of ARIN's mission to
> 'mandate a business practice change' like requiring v6 implementation as a
> condition of receiving future v4 allocations.
And I argue that ARIN policy already dictates business practice
through needs based assignment/allocation based on efficient
> In a brief discussion about the legality of such....I now believe(or
> interpret what I heard) that ARIN might arguably do this without undue
I'm sorry - does that say that you now believe ARIN *can* do this
without risk or can *not* do this without risk? Could you provide any
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...