[arin-ppml] Opposed to 2010-9 and 2010-12

On Oct 10, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at> wrote:

> On Oct 10, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>> Is there any reason a large ISP might want more than one 6rd scheme?
> Not that I can think of, and, the real problem with 6rd is that it doesn't matter what
> size ISP you are... From the tiniest to the largest, they all consume the same
> messed up prefix size for the same number of end bits to the end site.
> So even a tiny ISP with 100 customers, if they want to give /56s to their end sites
> will still consume 56-32 = /24.

Well, if you only have one v4 prefix, you don't need 32 bits.  That only helps in the smallest cases though.