[arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)
[ clip ]
> I could only be comfortable with something like this were it to be
> accompanied by a much larger framework for reserved pools of addresses,
> address pools which had other qualifiers for eligibility, such as new
> organizations, organizations with no existing or seriously limited
> resources, one-shot open to anybody pool, and similar.
Note, that's what the last proposal had and one of the major themes about
it's failure was the classes and complexities.
> I also would like for such a proposal to encompass more or the entirety
> of the last /8 and to be refilled by returns/revokes if/when they occur.
I think that this might be a half-way decent idea and I believe, but I may
be recalling wrong, that this is the intent.
>From LGA, Best,