ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] early experimenter /32 catch-22

I'm hoping that with sparse allocation ARIN would just be able to grow
their existing block.

GG

On 10-10-07 3:47 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow at gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Dul - andrew.dul
><andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
>> We told people to go out and get a /32 to get some experience with IPv6,
>> so a lot of people went out and were allocated /32s.  Now that we are
>> actually getting ready to deploy production networks a number of the
>>large
>> providers need to get larger blocks to address their networks even
>>though
>> they haven't used up their current /32.
>
>or another allocation for a distinct routing domain
>or another allocation for a new technology deployment
>or ...
>
>> Seems like we need a simple policy that will either allow an ISP to
>>return
>> the /32 in exchange for a larger block or get an additional larger block
>> that they can renumber into.
>
>yes, to the second part. (I think)
>
>> This "production" block should be justified based upon current customer
>> count, an expected growth rate over the next 5-10 years, and the
>>expected
>> network topology assuming some regional aggregation for large networks.
>
>-chris
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.