[arin-ppml] Opposed to 2010-9 and 2010-12
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:
> I am opposed to both proposals because the camel creeping from right to left
> of the bitspace is really starting to concern me.
> Transition space for 6rd can in theory justify a /16 allocation if you are
> doing /48 per customer.
I think John clarified that unless we fix the fundamental
address allocation policy, it's not clear we have a way
to do a sane and reasonable initial allocation that supports
6rd, so we probably need to look at fixing not just subsequent
allocation policy, but also initial allocation policy.
Sometimes picking up rocks reveals things underneath
you really hadn't planned on coming face-to-face with. ^_^;