[arin-ppml] Preemptive IPv6 assignment
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Heather Schiller
<heather.skanks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Obtaining v6 address space is not the problem, deployment is. Giving
> people IPv6 space is *not* the same thing as deployment. If getting
> space is the problem, that should be addressed in policy. Unlike a
> couple of years ago, we aren't hearing a cacophony of folks who can
> not get an IPv6 prefix. It's likely that most people who want space
> can get it, more importantly they can get it in a timely manner that
> would not interfere with their deployment plans. Massively assigning
> space doesn't come with a person to design your addressing plan,
> updated software tools to support and configure, or turn v6 on your
> In fact, I would argue against forced assignment - because monitoring
> number of requests from the RIR may be a useful measure of potential
> v6 adoption - if nothing else, it's an indication of the number of
> organizations who have given it enough consideration to request a
> prefix. By letting folks request v6 on their own, you have a handy
> list of folks who need outreach.
and... you let them decide what size prefix is proper for their
deployment needs. If they don't have a design/deploymenr in mind, what
size would you assign them? what about future needs?
forced assignment has many problems... imho.
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:46 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> Over the course of the week I've had the opportunity to talk to a
>> number of wonderful folks in the operator community here at the
>> meeting in Atlanta. As expected we often talked of IPv6 and in some
>> cases the conversation wandered to a question that has puzzled me for
>> some time:
>> "Why not look in the BGP table, take every announced ARIN AS number
>> and preemptively assign IPv6 addresses to each associated organization
>> that doesn't already have them? Not forever of course... give it three
>> years and then the assignments evaporate unless claimed by signing an
>> RSA and paying the annual fees."
>> When I posed this question the responses were largely variants on,
>> "That would make too much sense."
>> So I put it to the list. Have we some stick rammed far enough up our
>> collective backside that we're willing to tell people: you MUST deploy
>> IPv6, it alone will save the Internet's soul. And oh by the way you
>> need our permission to start for real. So fill out the form, make your
>> checks payable and we'll get back to you.
>> For your consideration,
>> Bill Herrin
>> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
>> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.