ARIN-PPML Message

[arin-ppml] I Oppose 2010-12: IPv6 Subsequent Allocation

I could live with these changes.

Shall I summarize them in a proposal for the meeting this afternoon?

- Mark

On 10/5/10 3:56 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I would actually support these changes. I'd put the upper bound at /24 rather than /26, as I
> believe we should stop issuing things on non-nibble boundaries in general.
>
>
> Owen
>
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 4:35 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Azinger, Marla <Marla.Azinger at ftr.com> wrote:
>>> Bill or anyone else that sees this as a missing value-
>>> What text would you suggest to resolve what you see as a missing value?
>> Hi Marla,
>>
>> I need to think about it some more, but off the cuff I think I'd place
>> a few limits:
>>
>> 1. No organization can justify holding total IPv6 allocations that
>> exceed /26 under this policy.
>>
>> Rationale: If you think you need more than that, you haven't thought
>> it through well enough.
>>
>> 2. No organization can justify more than two disaggregate allocations
>> under this policy irrespective of individual or total size.
>>
>> Rationale: You get a couple tries but then you have to clear out and
>> return one of your earlier tries before you can make attempt number
>> three.
>>
>> 3. Unless organization is mapping more than, and I'm picking a number
>> out of my hat here, 5 disaggregate IPv4 allocations with the
>> transition mechanism the the largest additional allocation they can
>> justify is a /32.
>>
>> Rationale: you shouldn't be mapping the full 32 bits of the Ipv4
>> address into the upper 64 bits of address space unless you're juggling
>> so many different IPv4 allocations that it just isn't practical to do
>> it any other way... And transition mechanisms that need to consume
>> ARIN allocations but must map the full 32 bit address aren't credible.
>>
>>
>> Also I suggest ditching the 3-year resource review. We barely review
>> V4 resources as we approach a critical shortage. We're not seriously
>> going to review IPv6 allocations for a long, long time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill Herrin
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
>> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.