[arin-ppml] Props. 122 + 123 process?
On 11/30/10 2:09 PM, "David Farmer" <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> On 11/30/10 09:44 CST, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>> That thread you quote isn't relevant, IMHO. It's already been established in
>> the previous public policy meeting and following that the policy is flawed
>> and we have multiple parties here agreeing.
> I agreed earlier and still agree there there is a strong consensus that
> 4.10 should be changed.
I'm really not sure what the relevance of continuing to argue that 4.10 in
it's present form is better than anything absent an actual proposal. There's
a proposal on the table to suspend 4.10. It was modified to answer
objections related to concerns that this /10 would be returned to the free
pool. So far, there are no other objections I can act on other than
As far as I can tell, there should be no roadblocks to suspending it so that
we can fix it.
Not sure if you noticed:
[arin-announce] Four /8 Blocks Allocated to the RIRs 2.73% Remains at