[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for FuturePolicy Development
What criteria would you use for "not being effectively utilized"?
Less than X% of the space given out Y months after exhaustion? Less
than Z requests fulfilled under 4.10?
What other uses would be appropriate? All valid requests? Limit it
somehow to avoid giving out all of the remaining reserved space at
once to people on the waiting list?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Bill Darte <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
> Leave 4.10 space for what it is now for.
> Establish, if need be, an adjunct policy that allows that pool to be raided
> for other uses if after a period of time 6, 9, 12 months indicates that it
> is not being effectively utilized.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net on behalf of Scott Leibrand
> Sent: Wed 11/24/2010 6:14 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for FuturePolicy
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty at akamai.com> wrote:
>> On 11/24/10 11:53 PM, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
>>> In a message written on Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:08:38PM -0800, Owen
>>>> Hence my suggestion that 122 would be more palatable if it set aside
>>>> a separate /10 for that purpose rather than raiding 4.10.
>>> I would not object to a second /10, but I'm sure I see it as necessary.
>> It would only amplify the defects in 4.10.
> So do you see the problem as being that 4.10 will leaving addresses
> reserved for too long without putting them into use?
> If so, would there be additional criteria for giving out 4.10 reserved
> space that would alleviate the defects in 4.10 from your perspective?
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.