[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development
On 11/23/10 5:34 PM, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
> I agree with your statement, but I also believe there's enough
> information to get everyone on the same page. When we have only a
> /10 left, everyone is screwed. There is no using that /10 to make
> even 1/1000th of the people happy. We're out, done, and if your
> business depends on it you might as well go ahead and turn out the
> lights. I've not seen a single person suggest how the last /10
> could save businesses that have failed to plan.
I think that there's almost enough information to get people on the same
page. We're still not sure what the "final" inventory of address space will
be with respect to the last /8's; 3 x /8 at the end or 1 x /8 at the end to
add to whatever may be in reserve. Reserve pools are allowed for under the
current global allocation policy and are not counted when seeking new /8's.
[ clip ]
> We need to get out of the mindset that if someone has totally ignored
> IPv6 transition we have something good waiting for them in the wings.
> We don't.
The idea is somewhat of a continued transition and supporting the presence
of a v4 network for "some" period of time beyond exhaustion, among other
things, isn't it?