[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for FuturePolicy Development
On 11/22/10 4:59 PM, "Bill Darte" <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
> Or one could simply require a periodic review of the utility being
> served by 4.10 and redirect use of those addresses as befits the current
> 'on the ground' reality.
Interesting, but that doesn't need to be codified. We've almost all agreed
that this policy is insufficient, and previously a large group of members
supported an effort to modifiy it though petition.
I'm going to make some adjustments to proposal 122 that will remove the fear
mongering with respect to allowing these addresses to lapse into the free
pool and the AC can take it up. The precedent has already been set. Change
was already petitioned once. The fact that exhaustion is on the door step
changes little IMHO.