[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 123: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure
On 11/19/10 5:01 PM, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
> Marty is coming out firing! :)
> In a message written on Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:47:48AM -0500, ARIN wrote:
>> Upon receipt of the last /8 that the IANA will allocate to ARIN per the
>> Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space,
>> ARIN will place a contiguous /20 in reserve for Critical Infrastructure.
> It should be no surprise I support this policy in general, but I
> have no idea if a /20 is the right size or not.
Two additional thoughts. First, does this need to be contiguous? Second, we
should probably make this permanent. There's a risk that CI needs will be
overrun if 4.10 survives or if we fail to act by 20 OCT 2011 on Prop 122.