[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 120: Protecting Number Resources
ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
Mailing list subscription information can be found
Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
## * ##
Policy Proposal 120: Protecting Number Resources
Proposal Originator: Leo Bicknell
Proposal Version: 1.0
Date: 5 November 2010
Proposal type: new
Policy term: permanent
ARIN shall use any reasonable and practical methods to proactively
look for fraudulently obtained or abandoned number resources and
seek the return of those resources to ARIN.
A report of activities under this policy shall be delivered at each
ARIN has generally only reactively looked for fraudulently obtained
or abandoned number resources, generally via reports to
While it is great for ARIN to take these community reports, ARIN
can be in a far better position to know which resources were
fraudulently obtained or abandoned due to the additional paperwork
that ARIN holds which is not available to the public, and the record
of interactions (or lack thereof) with the resource holder.
] From: John Curran <jcurran at arin.net>
] To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org>
] CC: "arin-ppml at arin.net" <arin-ppml at arin.net>
] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Audits
] On Nov 5, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
] > What would the community have to get the ARIN staff to go proactively
] > looking for fraud, abuse, defunct companies and other non-compliant
] > uses of the address space?
] As usual: have the community develop an appropriate policy and ensure that
] there is an adequate level of support for the increased ARIN costs (which
] will appear back as overall service fees) once we get to implementation.
I expect the board/executive management will interpret reasonable
and practical to be some amount of staff time that is not zero, but
will also not "break the bank".
I also expect that ARIN will report on the number resources (in the
aggregate) that were returned due to this proactive activity, as
well as the cost to the members of this activity (again, in the
aggregate) so as to obtain feedback if more, or less resources
should be used in this area.
Timetable for implementation: immediate