On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:49 AM, John Curran wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> What would the community have to get the ARIN staff to go proactively
>> looking for fraud, abuse, defunct companies and other non-compliant
>> uses of the address space?
> As usual: have the community develop an appropriate policy and ensure that
> there is an adequate level of support for the increased ARIN costs (which
> will appear back as overall service fees) once we get to implementation.
We tried this with 2010-11 and the community abandoned it primarily
because staff said it wasn't necessary and they got the message that we
wanted them to be more active and report more on anti-fraud activities.
From your message above, it appears only the report more portion
of the message actually got through.