[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
> I think that we should go ahead with allocating a /8 for ULA-C
> addresses without any significant technical changes to this
> Internet draft
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-02>
Are there changes between Tony's Draft and this one that you object to?
Tony's draft seems to be the most current.
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================