[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks

[David Farmer]

Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
> John Santos wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> People with private networks may not/probably don't have ASNs.
>>
>> Same for people with legacy class "C" addesses that upstreams
>> refuse to route, but which are extemely useful for private internets
>> because they can't collide with customer/vendor/peer internal addresses,
>> unlike RFC1918.
> 
> if you don't adevertise it for log enough,chances are someone else will.

This is the reason I'm at least willing to consider a way to filter 
"never to be advertised networks".  However, if/when resource 
certification (A.K.A. RPKI) come into common use this could be much less 
of a problem.  So, I'm not absolutely sure even these networks need to 
be filterable, especially in the long-term.  But, maybe in the near-term 
this could be helpful to prevent abuse, and what happens if RPKI is 
stillborn.

Just thinking out loud.

> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota	
2218 University Ave SE	    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================