[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 102: Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations
William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote:
>> However, multihomers who qualify for a /22 right now are completely
>> free to KEEP that /22 and go get another /22, when requesting an
>> additional allocation. Thus, creating 2 DFZ entries.
>> Under this proposal we put a stop to that. Multihomers no longer exist
>> as a special class, when ANYONE gets a /22 and then goes and requests
>> an additional allocation, they will have to return that first /22 to get
>> their /21. Thus, knocking then back down to 1 DFZ entry.
> Hmm. I missed that on the first read. Not sure what I think of it.
That's what I was opposing, not availability to small entities.