[arin-ppml] 2009-1 comment

[Brian Johnson]

Paul,

Is 2008-6 receiving wide approval by the community? Does this policy
coincide with the ARIN charter and the goals of the organization?

Perhaps this is the issue?

Just my .02

- Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net]
On
> Behalf Of Paul Vixie
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:49 PM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] 2009-1 comment
> 
> these two messages bring up an important question.
> 
> kkargel at polartel.com ("Kevin Kargel") writes:
> 
> > My problem is the outright sale of space to a designated party
> without
> > transfer of network assets and without making the space available to
> the
> > community at large as is allowed in 8.3.  This creates an enormous
> > potential for unfair practice giving the large players a huge
> advantage.
> 
> jay at impulse.net (Jay Hennigan) writes:
> 
> > I am opposed to this proposal as written.  I would support it if
> section
> > 8.3 were stricken in its entirety.
> 
> is everyone fully aware that a version of this same policy has already
> been
> approved (2008-6) and stands to go into effect on june 1, and that
> what's
> being discussed here is a cleaned up version (2009-1)?
> 
> that means, opposition to 2009-1's proposed 8.3 in ignorance of 2008-
> 6's
> effective 8.3 won't help any cause.  to stop address space transfers
> from
> taking place apart from acquisitions, would require a new transfer
> policy
> that undid the effect of 2008-6.  2009-1 will not be *that* policy.
> --
> Paul Vixie
> KI6YSY
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.