[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria - revised

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:25, Owen DeLong <owen at> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Member Services wrote:
>> be currently Multihomed (or immediately become Multihomed) and have an
>> ARIN assigned AS number.
> Why would you want to preclude the use of legacy ASNs and/or ASNs issued
> by other registries?

I had not thought of legacy ASNs - perhaps the wording should be
"...and have a validly assigned AS number."?

> Otherwise, I'm generally OK with the policy, but, would be strongly in favor
> of it at 100 sites rather than 200 as I do know of ISPs that are smaller than
> 200 sites, are not multihomed, but, are legitimate.
> Owen
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at if you experience any issues.